Archive for the 'Sufficiency of Scripture' Category

Do You Trust Your Bible?

Monday, November 7th, 2011

Do You Trust Your Bible?

G. K. Chesterton noted that, “The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult; and left untried.”

The same could be said for biblical counseling. “The sufficiency of Scripture ideal has not been tried and found wanting. It has been found difficult; and left untried.”

I was stuck by this realization while working on a presentation paper for the upcoming Evangelical Theological Society (ETS) meeting in San Francisco. My topic is: A Theologically-Informed Approach to Sexual Abuse Counseling: Implementing the Hermeneutical Spiral.

With an issue like sexual abuse counseling, I believe we tend toward two extremes.

Extreme # 1: A One-Verse, One-Problem, One-Solution “Concordance” Approach

We can illustrate this approach with another important life issue—anxiety. Someone comes to us with “anxiety issues” and we quote Philippians 4:6 about being anxious for nothing.

We’re like a physician who says, “Take two pills and call me in the morning.” But we’re really saying, “Take one verse and don’t call me!”

This is a shallow, non-relational, and lazy approach to ministering to people. It’s also ineffectual and unbiblical.

Extreme # 2: A Solution-Focused, “Secular” Approach

Because of the stereotype of extreme # 1, many people—pastors, Christian counselors, educators, and “lay” spiritual friends—tend toward the opposite extreme. We don’t want to be shallow and non-relational, and we don’t find the phrase “sexual abuse” in our concordance, so we wrongly assume that the Bible does not adequately address real life issues.

So, if we’re a “lay person,” we race to the self-help shelf of our local bookstore, or we open the Amazon Books tag in our web browser and type in “sexual abuse.” Thinking there’s not a quick biblical answer addressing sexual abuse recovery, we assume there’s no biblical answer at all.

We abdicate our time-tested (two-thousand years of church history), biblical responsibility to be soul physicians who understand life from the perspective of the Author of life, who understand the creature through the words of the Creator.

Sad Example A: The “Secular” Approach in the Church

What’s really sad is when we find this approach in churches, especially churches where in the pulpit the “sufficiency of Scripture” is taught and modeled. Think about that. You have a church where the pastor faithfully exegetes God’s Word, develops a passage in context, and applies it accurately to real life. Yet, in the same church, in the “counseling wing,” in the “personal ministry of the Word,” an entirely different mindset holds sway.

Rather than trusting the authority, relevancy, profundity, and sufficiency of God’s Word for real life issues in the counselor’s office, the counselor turns to and depends upon secular concepts in an attempt to address issues of the soul. That pastoral counselor might actively pray for and with parishioners. The pastoral counselor might “baptize” the counseling appointment by sprinkling in the occasional verse of comfort or guidance. However, the counselor fails to develop a comprehensive, compassionate, Christ-centered approach to the life issue.

Sad Example B: The “Secular Approach in Christian Higher Education

I find it equally sad when we see this approach in Christian higher education. This is especially sad and even maddening in schools where the Bible department, the biblical languages departments, and the theology departments all model a trust in the sufficiency of Scripture. Yet, in the pastoral ministry department or the counseling department, that trust is less evident.

Rather than teaching their pastors-to-be and their counselors-to-be how to engage Scripture deeply and how to relate truth to life wisely and lovingly, the bulk of the time is spent in examining what the world has to say. And a decent amount of time is spent criticizing those “naïve biblical counselors” with their one-verse, one-problem, one-solution approach.

There has to be a better, more biblical way, right? These two extremes can’t be our only options, can they?

A Biblical Way: A SOUL-u-tion-Focused “Concept” Approach

Anyone who reads my blog posts or my books knows that I’m not a “psychology basher.” I don’t spend my time and expend my energy on “what I’m against.” I focus on “what I’m for”—changing lives with Christ’s changeless truth.

While I can’t reproduce my entire ETS paper here in blog form (it’s over 10,000 words), I can offer a way forward. For those convinced that the Bible provides wise counsel for specific and significant soul issues, the core question is, “In what form are those answers provided?”

We won’t find the biblical answer in the “concordance form”—one-problem, one-verse, one-solution. Instead, the Bible provides counsel for specific and significant soul issues in a “concept form.” This requires that we conceptualize problems using biblical wisdom principles that address the complexity of real and raw life as lived in a fallen and broken world.

This takes time, effort, training, work, energy, prayer, and dependence upon the Spirit. That’s why it is so seldom done.

We race to one verse or one secular book rather than entering the marathon of the hard work of studying the Bible cover to cover to relate God’s truth to human life. While our concordance may not contain the phrase “sexual abuse,” the Bible comprehensively and compassionate addresses life concepts such as gender, sexuality, sexual sin, shame, shalom, masculinity, femininity, power and powerlessness, abuse, voice and voicelessness, hiding, longings, desires, mindsets, motivations, emotions, self-protection, comfort, healing, forgiveness, confrontation, mind renewal, the image of God, and so much more.

The Bible offers a robust, relevant, and relational understanding of the damage done by sexual abuse and of the way forward toward Christ-centered healing from sexual abuse. What we need is a biblical and theological approach that provide a way of viewing and using the Bible to develop a theology and methodology of sexual abuse counseling.

The intent of my ETS paper is to share “the how to.” For far too long we’ve told people to trust the sufficiency of Scripture, yet we’ve failed to teach people how to view the Bible and we’ve failed to equip people how to use the Bible to relate truth to life.

The intent of this blog post is to raise awareness, to provoke toward deeper thinking, to challenge each of us to “put feet” to our trust in God’s Word.

Join the Conversation

Do you trust your Bible?

When you or someone you care about is struggling with an intense, real-life issue, where do you turn?

If you turn to your Bible, do you turn there in a way that produces a robust, relational, relevant, Christ-centered approach for changing lives with Christ’s changeless truth?

Note: After November 20, 2011, you can go to my RPM Ministries Free Resources Page to download my ETS paper. Scroll down on that page to the ETS label and click on: A Theologically-Informed Approach to Sexual Abuse Counseling: Implementing the Hermeneutical Spiral.

Tags: , , , ,

How to View and Use the Bible for Biblical Counseling

Thursday, January 13th, 2011

How to View and Use the Bible for Biblical Counseling

For day three of the class I’m teaching at Capital Bible Seminary, we explored a theology of biblical counseling, examining:

• What the Bible says about the purity, priority, promise, and purpose of special revelation

• What the Bible teaches about the nature and purpose of general revelation

• The biblical teaching on common grace

• The biblical teaching on total depravity

For day four, we’ll be discussing How to View the Bible for Biblical Counseling. We’ll examine:

• The Point of the Bible for Matters of the Soul

• The Principles of the Bible for Matters of the Soul

• The Promise of the Bible for Matters of the Soul

• The Power of the Bible for Matters of the Soul

• The Purpose of the Bible for Matters of the Soul

• The Process of the Bible for Matters of the Soul

• The Pattern of the Bible for Matters of the Soul

Then on Friday, we’ll examine How to Use the Bible for Biblical Counseling. For a manuscript of the lesson, go to Scripture and Soul.

Join the Conversation

How do you view the Bible for biblical counseling? How do you use the Bible to develop a biblical model of counseling?


Share


Tags: , , ,

The Sufficiency of Christ

Tuesday, January 11th, 2011

The Sufficiency of Christ

For day two of the class I’m teaching at Capital Bible Seminary, we’re focusing on the sufficiency of Christ.

From Colossians 1, we’ll discuss the sufficiency of Christ’s grace. His grace is sufficient for our identity, our relationality, our ministry, and our victory. In Christ we have all-sufficient rescue, redemption, rule, reconciliation, regeneration, and revelation. Only Christ is sufficient for relational living now and forever. We’ll apply these truths to practical biblical counseling issues.

From Colossians 2,we’ll explore the sufficiency of Christ’s wisdom. We’ll compare and contrast the wisdom of the world and the wisdom of the Word. We’ll probe the robust, relational wisdom that we find only in Christ and His Word We’ll apply these truths to the discussion of the sufficiency of Scripture.

Throughout the day, we’ll discuss complex, real-life counseling issues and ponder how to explore God’s Word to develop robust insights for understanding people, diagnosing problems, and prescriping solutions–biblically, relationally, practically, and comprehensively.

Join the Conversation

How does the sufficiency of Christ impact your daily life, relationships, and ministry?

Tags: , ,

The Sufficiency of Christianity

Monday, January 10th, 2011

The Sufficiency of Christianity

Today begins day one of my five-day modular class I’m teaching at Capital Bible Seminary.

We’re focused today on the Sufficiency of Christianity. The questions we’ll address on day one include:

  • What is the state of biblical counseling today?
  • What is the purpose/definition of biblical counseling?
  • What is Christ’s grace sufficient for?
  • Where do we find wisdom for living?
  • How and where do we find truth?

Join the Conversation

How would you answer any of today’s questions?

Tags: ,

An Almost Indispensable Book on the Bible

Saturday, November 6th, 2010

An Almost Indispensable Book on the Bible

Where can you find a book about that Bible that is both pastoral and theological? It’s rare. But one has arrived. It is John Frame’s opus: The Doctrine of the Word of God.

Don’t take my word for it. Listen to what Dr. J. I. Packer says.

“Recently a former student wrote to me as follows: ‘Dr. Packer, is there a reasonably recent work on the nature of Scripture that you would consider magisterial or close to indispensable, other than the Bible?’ At that time, I could not name a book that met these specifications. But now I can, and this is it.”

Packer continues: “The big idea that holds everything in this big book together is pastoral, and that to my mind is as it should be. As I was writing this foreword, I learned of a Chinese lady, a seventy-year-old watermelon grower named Jin, who said, ‘Reading the Bible is like having God talk to you.’ This is precisely the truth that Frame follows through, start to finish.”

• The main contention of this volume is that God’s speech to man . . . is very much like one person speaking to another. . . .

• My thesis is that God’s word, in all its qualities and aspects, is a personal communication from him to us.

Packer concludes: “So where are we? ‘Magisterial’? Yes. ‘Close to indispensable’? Yes again. Would John Calvin, Jonathan Edwards, Abraham Kuyper, and B. B. Warfield, Reformed theology’s Fabulous Four (in my book, anyway), enthuse about this volume as I have done? Pretty much, I think. There, I have had my say. Now read on, and taste the good food for yourself.”

In my view, The Doctrine of the Word of God is vital for every Christian. It will be especially significant for everyone interested in biblical counseling. In addition to the themes developed throughout the entire book, Frame has an entire section on The Sufficiency of Scripture.

For a free forty-six pages overview of the book, go to WTS Books.

Join the Conversation

What is your favorite book about the Scriptures?


Share


Tags: , , , , ,

Responding to Brian McLaren’s Question # 2: The Authority Question

Saturday, March 13th, 2010

A Conversation about Brian McLaren’s A New Kind of Christianity

Responding to Brian McLaren’s Question # 2: The Authority Question

Welcome: You’re reading “Part 4” of my blog series responding to Brian McLaren’s book A New Kind of Christianity (read Part 1 here, Part 2 here, and Part 3 here). Many have engaged Brian’s thinking by focusing on a systematic theology response (visit here for a boatload of links). My focus is on pastoral theology or practical theology. As a pastor, counselor, and professor who equips the church for biblical counseling and spiritual formation, I’m asking: “What difference does our response to each question make for how we care like Christ (biblical counseling) and for how we live like Christ (spiritual formation)?”

The Question of the Bible’s Sufficiency

Brian’s second question is the authority question. How should we understand the Bible? He’s asking, What is the Bible and what is it for? He feels a moral obligation to revisit how we view the Bible.

In defending his revisioning of Scripture, Brian again resorts to caricature. He speaks of preachers passionately decrying psychology because they see the only relevant biblical categories being disobedience and demon possession (p. 68). Well, many of us decry secular psychological assumptions that seek to understand the creature apart from the Creator. However, many of us have spent our lives developing a biblical psychology—a robust understanding of people, problems, and solutions derived from a Bible that we cherish as sufficient, authoritative, relevant, and profound. (See my Soul Physicians for one example.)

He says we’re steering our ship by wrestling with biblical passages in a simple “thou shalt not” way, and thus paralyzed in solving major life-and-death issues (p. 69). Well, many of us have been in the trenches wrestling with real people with real problem, thinking deeply with them about how God’s story intersects with their story. (See my Spiritual Friends for one example.)

Brian further claims that the Bible “offers us no clear categories for many of our most significant and vexing socioethical quandaries” (p. 68). Wow. Some of us talk about the sufficiency, authority, relevancy, and profundity of Scripture for biblical counseling and spiritual formation. Brian presents the insufficiency, incapacity, irrelevance, and shallowness of Scripture for life and ministry.

Read with confidence and applied with wisdom, the Bible offers us categories for thinking about everything we need for daily life and godly living (2 Peter 1:3; Hebrews 4:12-16; 2 Timothy 3:16-17; Philippians 1:9-11; Colossians 2:3-10). I’m baffled as I attempt to visualize a pastoral counseling session from Brian’s perspective of the Bible. In Spiritual Friends I offer 1,000s of sample “spiritual conversations” and “scriptural explorations” all based upon the sufficiency, authority, relevancy, and profundity of God’s Word. What would Brian offer (WWBO)?

WWBO: What Would Brian Offer?

Reading the three chapters in which Brian shares his view of Scripture, I felt like I was watching an episode of American Idol. If Simon Cowell was responding, he might have said, “Sorry, Brian, but that was a mess.” I could almost hear Randy Jackson saying, “Listen dude. Yo dawg. For me for you; I just didn’t get it. It was pitchy and karaoke.”

Brian’s Bible is filled with internal inconsistencies (p. 81) because his Bible is neither authoritative nor inspired (pp. 82-83). His Bible was never intended to provide answers to deep questions, but rather to stimulate conversations without any final direction (p. 92).

Why? Because for Brian the God of the Bible (using Job as an example) is “not the actual God necessarily, but the imagined God, the author’s best sense of God, the fictional character playing God for the sake of this dramatic work of art” (p. 94). Try telling that to the person in the midst of horrible life suffering. Try telling that to the person in need of empowered wisdom to break the chains of a besetting sin.

WWJS: What Would Jesus Say?

Brian sees the Bible through evolutionary lenses. In each generation, it was the current best attempt to conceptualize who God is, who we are, how we relate to God and to one another. We need to come to the Bible with more enlightened eyes, more evolved insight—according to Brian.

Brian also says that he wants us to return to the place where we look at the Bible through Jesus’ eyes. He says he is “a follower of Jesus and a devoted student of the Bible” (p. 83). Taking him at his word, I want us to ask together, “What would Jesus say?” Did Jesus see the Bible the way Brian sees it?

Jesus tells us that “Man does not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God” (Matthew 4:4). In the midst of personal suffering, trials, and temptations, Jesus clung to and exhorted us to cling to the sufficient, authoritative, relevant, and profound Word of God.

Jesus said, “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:17-18). In the midst of a sermon on personal, social ethics Jesus related Old Testament truth to daily life, in so doing teaching us to trust in the sufficiency, authority, relevancy, and profundity of Scripture for life, ministry, and relationships today.

Clearly, we can all misinterpret and misapply Scripture. No one should claim that their interpretation or application is inspired or inerrant. However, that’s infinitely different from claiming that the Bible itself is not inspired or inerrant. That’s why we must interpret and apply the Bible humbly in community. Humbly—but with confidence that God’s Word provides the wisdom we need to love God and others. Without that humble confidence in the sufficiency, authority, relevancy, and profundity of Scripture we have no basis for biblical counseling and spiritual formation.

The Rest of the Story

In our next post, we explore the God question. Brian asks, “Is God violent?” We respond to his response—through the lens of biblical counseling and spiritual formation.

Join the Conversation

What view of and use of the Bible do you follow as you minister God’s Word to hurting and hardened, suffering and sinning people?

Share/Bookmark

Tags: , , , ,